By Nick Ravenshade — October 1, 2025
WASHINGTON — The federal government shut down at 12:01 a.m. on Wednesday after Congress failed to pass stopgap funding to carry agencies into fiscal year 2026, plunging Washington into an immediate and wide-ranging disruption of public services, furloughs for hundreds of thousands of federal workers and renewed political recrimination from both parties. The impasse followed last-minute votes in the Senate that collapsed without a compromise on funding tied to heated demands over health-care subsidies and program cuts.
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill traded blame: Democrats said they would not accept a clean continuing resolution unless it restored Affordable Care Act premium subsidies and reversed cuts to Medicaid and community health programs, while Republicans argued that health policy should not be attached to short-term funding and pressed a “clean” extension to buy time. The Senate’s failure to advance either a GOP short-term bill or a Democratic alternative left appropriations lapsing at midnight.
The political standoff was compounded by a forceful White House posture. In the run-up to the deadline the Office of Management and Budget instructed agencies to prepare reduction-in-force plans — guidance widely read in Washington as a threat of permanent job cuts if the funding lapse continued — and President Donald Trump publicly warned that there could be “irreversible” staffing changes and other deep program cuts if Democrats held their ground. Senate Democrats called the OMB guidance an act of intimidation and a dangerous escalation of executive leverage during a funding lapse.
The human scale of the shutdown is large. The Congressional Budget Office and other agency projections estimated that roughly three-quarters of a million federal employees could be furloughed or otherwise affected by the lapse, with the daily payroll impact measured in the hundreds of millions of dollars if the break endures. Agencies’ contingency plans show a patchwork of outcomes: many public-facing services and regulatory activities will be suspended or slowed, while programs deemed “excepted” for national security or public-safety reasons will continue to operate — in many cases with employees working without pay.
Operational effects were immediate. Federal Aviation Administration contingency filings said some 11,000 FAA staff would be furloughed while thousands of air-traffic controllers and tens of thousands of Transportation Security Administration screeners would continue to work, largely without pay, a scenario likely to produce overtime, staffing shortfalls and travel delays if the shutdown persists. The National Park Service warned that the bulk of its workforce could be furloughed and that many staffed facilities — visitor centers, campgrounds and ranger-led programs — would close even as open-access trails remain physically accessible, raising concerns about safety and resource damage. Meanwhile, the Department of Agriculture’s shutdown plan indicated tens of thousands of staff could be sidelined, limiting routine inspections, research and many program services.
Some high-profile programs and payments are insulated by law: Social Security and Medicare benefits are funded through permanent authorizations and continued disbursement is expected, and the Defense Department will maintain operations. But other services that millions rely on — loan approvals from the Small Business Administration, routine permits, many visa and immigration court proceedings, research at agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and parts of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — face freezes or delays that can ripple across businesses, hospitals and state governments. The Small Business Administration said it would pause many lending approvals; the Department of Homeland Security said most TSA employees would continue to work; and museum and cultural institutions funded by federal accounts have already signalled partial or full closures pending guidance.
The economic fallout was apparent within hours. Global markets reacted to the uncertainty: U.S. equity futures were softer and investors sought haven assets, while some analysts warned that data gaps resulting from the shutdown — notably delayed Bureau of Labor Statistics releases — could complicate Federal Reserve decision-making and heighten volatility. The Congressional Budget Office and other forecasters noted that a prolonged lapse would shave growth and could cost the economy hundreds of millions of dollars per day in lost compensation and activity.
For federal workers and contractors the effects are immediate and often painful. While historically Congress has provided back pay for furloughed employees once funding is restored, the possibility of the Trump administration moving beyond ordinary furlough plans toward permanent cuts or layoffs, as signalled by OMB instructions, has unsettled unions and local governments. Many private contractors who depend on steady government reimbursements face cash-flow challenges; small businesses that provide services to federal employees or depend on agency approvals may see revenues interrupted. State and local officials in heavily federal regions are already preparing contingency measures to support affected workers.
The shutdown also presents a logistical challenge for agencies that must quickly distinguish “excepted” work required to protect life and property from discretionary activities that must pause. Federal contingency plans, compiled publicly in recent days, show significant variation across departments: some agencies, like the Treasury’s Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Education, expect broad furloughs with essential enforcement or benefit operations continuing; others, such as Defense and Homeland Security, anticipate most operational capacities will be retained but with strains on support functions. That unevenness will create a staggered set of disruptions felt differently by regions, industries and populations.
Politically, the shutdown ratchets up pressure on both parties. Democratic leaders argued that pressing for restored health subsidies and protections for vulnerable programs was a matter of principle and electoral urgency; Republicans and the White House countered that attaching such policy changes to short-term funding is improper and that a short clean extension would give time for fuller negotiations. With public opinion polls showing broad public distaste for shutdowns, both sides face the risk that prolonged closure will erode political capital — but the new element of potential permanent personnel cuts raises the stakes and complicates the arithmetic of compromise.
What happens next is uncertain but procedurally straightforward: Congress can reopen the government with a continuing resolution or a set of appropriations bills at any time, and history shows funding gaps have ended both via last-minute compromises and through political reversals. The margins for passage are narrow; a House bill backed by Republicans failed in the Senate, and Democrats have signalled they will not provide the votes for a clean stopgap without written guarantees on health-care provisions that they say would avert immediate harm to millions of Americans. Negotiations — and the timeline for any resolution — will be shaped by bargaining over substance (health subsidies and program restorations) and by the political calculations of members whose constituents include furloughed workers, federal contractors and small businesses.
Beyond the immediate, this shutdown will test new political dynamics. The administration’s explicit direction that agencies plan for reductions in force — and the public threats of deep cuts — make this moment materially different from many past funding gaps, where back pay and a relatively brief pause were the usual outcomes. If the White House follows through on plans to make long-term staffing changes or to cancel programs, the short shutdown could have lasting structural consequences for federal capacity in areas such as scientific research, regulatory inspections and public health surveillance. That prospect has alarmed scientists, small-business groups and some state leaders who rely on federal programs for continuity.
For now, the capital waits. Federal employees face a week of uncertainty; travelers and small businesses are calculating contingencies; agencies are executing contingency plans; and political leaders are bracing for a fight where the policy stakes (health-care funding and program design) and the human stakes (paychecks, benefits and essential services) are tightly intertwined. The shutdown’s length — and whether it evolves into a vehicle for broader policy change or is resolved quickly by a narrowly tailored compromise — will determine how painful and how lasting this interruption proves to be.
— Reporting by Nick Ravenshade. Sources: Reuters; Associated Press; The Washington Post; Al Jazeera; Federal News Network; U.S. Office of Personnel Management; Congressional Budget Office; Department contingency plans; Reuters market coverage.
Photo: Phongtran03, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Comments ()