Stalemate in Anchorage: Fallout from the Trump–Putin Summit and the Shadow of Concessions
Summit Ends Without Agreement
The landmark meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson concluded without a formal ceasefire or any binding deal to halt hostilities. President Trump insisted “there’s no deal until there’s a deal,” while President Putin spoke of mutual understanding but offered no timeline or conditions for ending the war.
Pressure Builds for Territorial Concessions
Rather than wrestle with sanctions relief or security guarantees, the summit spotlight shifted to possible land swaps. Trump signaled that Ukraine may need to cede territory such as Donetsk and Luhansk to unlock negotiations, a stance he later reiterated by placing the onus on Kyiv to accept land transfers before any peace framework can proceed.
Allies Excluded and European Pushback
Kyiv and its Western partners balked at being sidelined. President Zelenskiy flatly rejected any deal that stripped Ukraine of sovereign land, declaring that “Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier” and stressing that true peace requires Kyiv’s full involvement. European leaders, including UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, echoed this demand, warning that negotiations without Ukraine could undermine the entire post–World War II security order.
Next Steps: Follow-Up Talks Amid Uncertainty
Despite the absence of a settlement, both sides agreed to keep diplomatic channels open. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed Russia expects a follow-up summit in Moscow, while Trump plans to meet President Zelenskiy in Washington to discuss potential frameworks, including security guarantees and prisoner exchanges. Detailed talks between U.S. and Russian foreign ministers are also on the horizon, though mutual mistrust threatens to stall progress.
Analysis: When Will the War End?
Experts caution that the summit did little to alter the basic battlefield calculus. With Putin showing no willingness to compromise on annexed regions and Trump placing unprecedented pressure on Kyiv to make territorial concessions, the most plausible path to any truce may rest on Ukraine agreeing to cede land. As seasoned observers note, the war may persist until the day Kyiv decides that conceding territory is the lesser evil—a reality that underscores the grim stakes of diplomacy in Anchorage.
Comments
Post a Comment